By
Ms. Rosemarie
Originally
posted at: The Mystical Rose webpage
For
many centuries, Catholics, Eastern Orthodox and some Protestants have used
images of Christ Crucified in their churches and homes, as a sign of their
faith and devotion to Our Lord. But in recent years crucifixes have come
under attack from both Evangelical Protestants (who erroneously believe sacred
images are "idolatrous") and certain "progressive"
Catholics (who wish to remove them from churches). Why don't they like
crucifixes, and is their opposition valid?
One
common Evangelical objection to crucifixes is: "Jesus isn't on the Cross
anymore, He is risen!". Well, we Catholics know that! We don't
believe Christ is still hanging on the Cross, and we do believe that He is
risen - that's why we celebrate Easter! Moreover, we certainly do not
make and display crucifixes in order to deny Jesus' Resurrection (this should
go without saying, but that almost seems to be implied in the above argument!).
Catholics
understand that a crucifix does not portray the current state of Our Lord.
It is intended to depict what He endured for our salvation long ago on Calvary. Though it seemed a shameful, humiliating
defeat at the time, Jesus' Death was actually a glorious triumph of love and
obedience. His Crucifixion brought about our redemption; this is why
Catholics love it and portray it in sacred art.
By
the same token, we find Evangelical objections to crucifixes a bit puzzling,
perhaps even ironic. They put such great emphasis on Christ's atoning
death in their preaching and hymns, and say that every sinner must tell Jesus
"I believe that You died for my sins" in order to get saved, yet they
are so hostile toward artistic representations of the salvific Event itself!
This inconsistency must arise from a distaste for anything perceived to
be "Catholic" (even though many Anglicans, Lutherans and other
mainline Protestants use crucifixes as well. The crucifix is a symbol all
Christians can embrace).
Here
is a sample Protestant hymn about Christ on the Cross:
At
the Cross
Text
by Isaac Watts; refrain by Ralph E. Hudson
1. Alas! and did my Savior bleed,
And did my Sovereign die?
Would He devote that Sacred Head
For such a worm as I?
And did my Sovereign die?
Would He devote that Sacred Head
For such a worm as I?
Refrain:
At the Cross, at the Cross,
where I first saw the light,
and the burden of my heart rolled away;
it was there by faith I received my sight,
and now I am happy all the day.
At the Cross, at the Cross,
where I first saw the light,
and the burden of my heart rolled away;
it was there by faith I received my sight,
and now I am happy all the day.
2. Was it for crimes that I had
done
He groaned upon the tree?
Amazing pity, grace unknown,
And love beyond degree!
He groaned upon the tree?
Amazing pity, grace unknown,
And love beyond degree!
3. Well might the sun in darkness
hide
And shut his glories in
When God, the mighty Maker, died
For man the creature's sin.
And shut his glories in
When God, the mighty Maker, died
For man the creature's sin.
4. Thus might I hide my blushing
face
While His dear Cross appears,
Dissolve my heart in thankfulness,
And melt mine eyes to tears.
While His dear Cross appears,
Dissolve my heart in thankfulness,
And melt mine eyes to tears.
5. But drops of grief can ne'er
repay
The debt of love I owe;
Here, Lord, I give myself away,
'Tis all that I can do.
The debt of love I owe;
Here, Lord, I give myself away,
'Tis all that I can do.
Reading
these touching words, it is hard to understand how some Evangelicals could sing
it and also oppose a crucifix. The latter portrays Christ's sufferings in
art; this lovely hymn portrays the same in poetry! It is, in fact,
something of a meditation on the Passion of Christ (and is that not the purpose
of a crucifix?).
If
crucifixes are unacceptable because "Jesus isn't on the Cross
anymore", then surely this hymn is unacceptable for the same reason.
"Why recall His suffering and humiliation? That's ancient
history!" Catholics use crucifixes the same way Protestants use this
hymn; to remember what our Savior did for us.
The
fact that Our Lord is no longer nailed to the Cross does not make crucifixes
wrong. Otherwise it would also be wrong to portray a Nativity scene,
since "Jesus isn't a baby anymore". It would also be wrong to
artistically depict Him teaching or healing, or to portray any Gospel event in
His earthly life, since "He's not on earth anymore". Yet many
Evangelicals have no problem with artistic portrayals of the Life of Christ in
art, Bibles, Sunday School classrooms, Christmas cards, etc. (Granted,
some Evangelicals object to all images of Jesus. Though their iconoclasm
is erroneous, at least they are consistent.)
Many
Evangelicals prefer to display a plain cross in their churches. They
argue that this is better than a crucifix because "An empty cross
signifies the Resurrection". But this assertion is highly
questionable; Jesus' Cross was empty the moment His body was taken down, yet He
was still dead! The empty tomb is a symbol of the Resurrection, not the
empty cross.
Traditionally
speaking, the cross is a symbol of Jesus Christ and of Christianity in general
(as the Star of David is a symbol of Judaism and the crescent of Islam).
It does not signify the Resurrection unless flanked with Easter lilies or
surrounded by rays of light. Of course, most crosses in Evangelical
churches are completely unadorned, with no such traditional symbols of the
Resurrection. So while the plain cross may symbolize Jesus, it could
hardly be said to signify the fact that He is risen.
I
think that if the early Christians could hear the "Empty
Cross=Resurrection" argument, they would consider it absurd. In
their day a cross was an instrument of capital punishment, so it definitely
signified death, much as an electric chair would today!
Some
Evangelicals and "progressive" Catholics who oppose crucifixes will
point out that the early Church never used them. This is true; back then
crucifixion was the most shameful, humiliating form of execution. So
although they reverenced the Cross as a symbol of Christ, they were reluctant
to artistically portray His Death.
After
crucifixion ceased to be used as a method of capital punishment, Catholics
began to cautiously depict Jesus' redeeming Sacrifice in art. In the days
of widespread illiteracy, sacred art served as a teaching tool, illustrating
the Faith for those unable to study it in books. The crucifix was thus a
powerful way to "preach Christ crucified" (I Cor 1:23) to the masses.
It can still serve that purpose today.
Though
early Christians did not make crucifixes, if you think about it, the first
crucifix was actually made by Jesus Himself! As He hung there dying on Calvary for the sins of the world, He and His Holy Cross
constituted the very first "crucifix" in history, the one after which
all others are ultimately patterned.
Another
argument used by "progressive" Catholics is that a crucifix is too
"negative" since it focuses more on Jesus' Death rather than on His
Resurrection. But His death was not negative, it is the source of our
salvation, a beautiful display of God's love for us! This attempt to pit
His Death against His Resurrection simply doesn't work, for the two go together
- if Christ hadn't died He couldn't have risen! As we have seen, the
crucifix is not a denial that Christ is risen; a Catholic church with a
crucifix on the altar may also have a brilliant stained glass window depicting
the Resurrection! The two are not in conflict at all; both are essential
mysteries of our redemption.
Should
Christians downplay Jesus' Death? St.
Paul didn't; in fact he told the Corinthians "For
I decided to know nothing among you except Jesus Christ and him crucified"
(1 Cor 2:2). Notice that he did not say "Jesus Christ and Him
crucified and risen". Was St.
Paul denying or downplaying the Resurrection? Or
what about when he wrote "Far be it from me to glory except in the cross
of our Lord Jesus Christ, by which the world has been crucified to me, and I to
the world" (Gal 6:14)? Was he being "negative" by focusing
on Christ's Death rather than His Resurrection?
No,
Paul was simply expressing the centrality of the Crucifixion to the Gospel
message. "But we preach Christ crucified, a stumbling block to Jews
and folly to Gentiles, but to those who are called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ
the power of God and the wisdom of God" (I Cor 1:23-24). I guess
"Christ crucified" is still a stumbling block to many today!
Should
Christians downplay Jesus' Death? Jesus Himself doesn't seem to think so!
When He appeared to His Apostles after rising from the dead, He
identified Himself by displaying the Wounds He had sustained on the Cross (Luke
24:39; John 20:20). Even though He is risen He still bears the scars of
His gruesome execution in His glorified Body! Why would He forever retain
those marks if He wanted us to just forget that unpleasant episode which
happened so very long ago and is all over with now?
And
even before He died, He gave us the Eucharist, which would be both a perpetual
reminder/declaration of His death and an actual re-presentation of His
sacrifice on Calvary. No, the Mass is
not a "re-sacrifice", Jesus does not die again. It is the very same
Sacrifice of Calvary made present on the Altar. Christ wants His
once-for-all Sacrifice on the Cross to be an ever-present reality, not just a
past event which is over and gone.
The
Jews believe that everyone who participates in a Passover supper (Seder)
mystically goes through the Exodus with Moses and the Israelites. Even
so, everyone who attends Mass/Divine Liturgy is mystically standing at the foot
of the Cross with Our Lady, St. John
and the holy women! Christ is our Paschal Lamb (I Cor 5:7-8), His
Sacrifice on the Cross is our Passover from death unto life. And the
Eucharist is our Seder, in which we partake of the Lamb of God, slain for our
sins. The Mass/Divine Liturgy actually transcends time, bringing the past
event of Jesus' Death to Christians throughout the ages.
So
although Jesus Christ is no longer on the Cross, His past Sacrifice on Calvary
becomes a present reality at every Mass.
This is why it is fitting to have a crucifix on the altar in a Catholic
church (in fact, the rubrics require it!). It is a beautiful reminder of
what Jesus went through to save us, and a representation of the mystery which
we celebrate at Mass.
Like St. Paul
before us, we Catholics glory in the Cross (Gal 6:14), we are not ashamed of
it. We proclaim His Death at every Mass (I Cor 11:26) and display
artistic renditions of His crucifixion in our churches and homes, not to deny
His Resurrection, but to joyfully proclaim His Death till He comes.
Praised be His Holy Name!
We
adore You, O Christ, and we praise You, for by Your Holy Cross You have
redeemed the world!
In
addition, when the body is on the cross, we can see and feel Jesus' suffering
for us.
"In Christ all the fullness
of God was pleased to dwell, and through Him to reconcile to Himself all
things, whether on earth or in heaven, making peace
by the blood of His cross." Colossians 1:19-20
"We
preach Christ crucified." I Corinthians 1:23
"I decided to know nothing
among you except Jesus Christ and Him crucified."
I Corinthians 2:2
"As often as you eat this
bread and drink the cup, you proclaim the Lord's
death until He comes." I Corinthians 11:26
"God forbid that I should
glory, except in the cross of our Lord Jesus Christ."
Galatians 6:16
"Let
us keep our eyes fixed on Jesus, the author and finisher of our faith, who for
the joy that was set before Him endured the cross, despising the shame,
and is seated at the right hand of the throne of God." Hebrews 12:2
We can safely affirm that our separated brethren are trying to find another target to attack Catholic Tradition. I have a friends of mine that they pretend to be Protestants, in that they no offer sacrifice to idols. My reply is always the same: throw your family pictures out of your wallet; and throw all those little figures that adorn your car. Finally, when the argument turns red I tell them: you worship the bible not God; because, not even amongst you are united, except when you came together to attack the Catholic Church, this is the only thing you have in common, because in everything else you depend on Catholic Doctrine. For instance the Trinity, Sunday Worship, hell, Natural Sin, etc…God bless
ReplyDeleteGod bless you too :)
ReplyDelete