by
Worth to Read |
MONTAGUE BROWN
Tolerance
accepts some inappropriate behavior for the sake of the common good; relativism
denies that good has any universal meaning and so accepts all behavior.
Tolerance
Acceptance of a wide range of behavior
Tolerance is
the willingness to accept actions we believe to be inappropriate or even wrong
because it would be worse to take action against them. Tolerance is
community-oriented. Ideally, all bad behavior should cease, but it is
unrealistic to think that society could succeed in enforcing this ideal.
Tolerance understands this.
Determining
what should and what should not be tolerated takes experience and prudence.
Every society must tolerate some wrongdoing, because the price of eliminating
it might be greater than the price of allowing it. For example, so long as
private wrong doing does no serious harm to the public, tolerance is required;
for the invasion of privacy necessary to correct every personal fault would
likely be worse than the fault itself.
However, it
cannot be that serious wrongdoings should be tolerated for social order. Some
situations warrant the toleration of some wrongdoing, but no situation makes
every act permissible. We should, as a society, tolerate a certain amount of
rudeness in the name of free speech and arrogance in the name of individual
expression. But to tolerate crimes such as rape and murder would be wrong,
since tolerating them would do greater harm to the community than correcting
them would.
ASK YOURSELF:
Do I accept some actions that do not
conform to objective moral standards? Is this because the attempt to correct
all faults would be worse for the community? If so, I am tolerant, Not a
relativist.
|
"I think that the state ought to
tolerate every principle of philosophy;
nor is there an instance, that any
government has suffered
in its political interests
by such indulgence."
David Hume
Concerning
Human Understanding, Sect 11, 114
Relativism
Acceptance
of all behavior
Relativism is
the assumption that there is no right or wrong. No action is considered better
or worse than any other. If this is so, all actions are equally acceptable.
Relativism is profoundly anti-community. If there are no standards of morality
to which we should adhere, tolerance is no better than intolerance.
Relativism
cannot distinguish between more or less serious wrongdoing. If I am a
relativist, I cannot (if I am to be consistent) praise or blame any moral
position. If I blame you for some action, you could always reply that my
judgment is relative to my particular time, culture, upbringing, personality,
etc., but not to yours. Since you are differenct from me in these respects, I
cannot rightly criticize your action.
There are
degrees of relativism. Ethics could be judged to be relative to a particular
culture, era, economic class, gender, or group. Ultimately, however, such group
relativism tends to lead to individual relativism; for if there are no
universal rights and wrongs, there is no reason why anyone in a certain group
or culture should abide by the relative values of that group or culture.
Tolerance arises out of a concern for the community, but relativism rules out
the possibility of common values and, hence, community.
ASK YOURSELF:
Do I refuse to pass judgment on any
actions? Is this because I deny the existence of objective moral standards?
If so, I am a relativist.
|
"And are
things relative to individuals,
as Protagoras tells us? For he says that man
is the measure of all things, and that things
are to me as they appear to me, and that
they are to you as they appear to you."
as Protagoras tells us? For he says that man
is the measure of all things, and that things
are to me as they appear to me, and that
they are to you as they appear to you."
Plato
Cratylus 386a
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Montague Brown.
"Tolerance/Relativism." In The One-Minute Philosopher (Manchester,
NH: Sophia Institute Press, 2001) 50-51.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments submitted must be civil, remain on-topic and not violate any laws. We reserve the right to delete any comments which are abusive, inappropriate or not constructive to the discussion.
Though we invite robust discussion, we reserve the right to not publish any comment which denigrates the human person.
This is a supervised forum and the Admin of CatholicPoint retains the right to direct it.
We also reserve the right to block any commenter for repeated violations