by c.pio
Blatant
allegation posted by friend against the Catholic Church:
The true Church established by Christ
cannot be a keeper of satanic teachings: Prohibition to marry (priests) and
abstain from eating meat (catholic call it Lent).
Catholic
Church a keeper of satanic teachings? Really?
This is of course complete nonsense! As Dr. Marshall said on his blog, Heretics always lift singular verses from context and argue from them. This is not the Catholic way.
This is of course complete nonsense! As Dr. Marshall said on his blog, Heretics always lift singular verses from context and argue from them. This is not the Catholic way.
1Timothy 4:3
Forbidding to marry, and commanding to abstain
from meats,
which God hath created to be received with thanksgiving of them which believe
and know the truth.
Forbid to marry? – The Priestly
Celibacy
Priestly celibacy is simply a matter of ecclesiastical discipline and not dogmatically
proscribed. It may be rule to some but not to other communities within
the Church, this explains why there are some married Catholic priests – to name
a few, the Eastern
Catholic Church, former
Anglican clergies who joined the Church etc.
The Catholic Priest with seven Children |
Eastern Rite Catholic Priest w/ his wife and son |
Another Married Catholic Priest together w/ his family |
No
one is required to take a vow of celibacy; those who do, do so voluntarily.
Celibacy is biblical:
Matthew 19:11–12: But he said to them, "Not everyone
can accept this saying, except those to whom celibacy has been granted, because
some men are celibate from birth, while some are celibate because they have
been made that way by others. Still others are celibate because they have made
themselves that way for the sake of the kingdom of heaven. Let anyone accept
this who can."
Celibacy
"for the sake of the kingdom of heaven" Christ said, he who is able
to accept this, let him accept it; a call that is not granted to all but granted
to some. Like what we have mentioned above, in reading the bible, the reader
must read each verse in context, rather than in isolation. The Bible is meant
to be read in its entirety, and never to be taken out of context. It is
therefore clear to us that 1timothy 4:3 cannot contradict Matthew 4:3
Apostle Paul also testify that he is celibate for the sake of the kingdom of God, he even exalted himself by saying he who marries does well and those who refrains from marriage will do better.
1 Corinthians 7:8 "To the unmarried and the widows I
say that it is well for them to remain single as I am.
verse 38: He who marries "does well; and he who refrains from marriage will do better" (1Corinthians 7:1-2, 6-9, 32-35, 38)
verse 38: He who marries "does well; and he who refrains from marriage will do better" (1Corinthians 7:1-2, 6-9, 32-35, 38)
Some
would ask, why do priest need to be removed
from his ministerial office and need a written dispensation from the Holy see
knowing that there is no rule in forbidding them to marry?
Answer:
He needs to do so because he broke his ought/vow to God that he will accept the
discipline of celibacy for the sake of God’s Kingdom
Ecclesiastes 5:4: When you make a promise to God, don't
delay in following through, for God takes no pleasure in fools. Keep all the
promises you make to him.
Commanding to abstain from
meats (Lent)? – The Fasting
Daniel 10:3: All that time I had eaten no rich food. No
meat or wine crossed my lips, and I used no fragrant lotions until those three
weeks had passed.
1
Corinthians 8:13 the Apostle Paul informed us, “Wherefore, if meat
make my brother to offend, I will eat no flesh while the world standeth,
lest I make my brother to offend.”
To
save space, one article of mine already addressed this matter, here is the link
Now
that we know that these teachings are not the Catholic Church, we must then go
deeper to dig for the truth. We must identify what particular group whom
Apostle Paul was referring to.
Gnostic Docetism
heresy
Gnostic
Docetism was an error concerning the nature of Christ. This error
developed out of the dualistic philosophy which viewed matter as
inherently evil, that God could not be associated with matter, and that
God, being perfect and infinite, could not suffer. Generally, it taught
that Jesus only appeared to have a body, that he was not really incarnate,
(Greek, "dokeo" = "to seem") or a denial that the Son
of God really became a man and really died. – Docetai (illusionists)
They
also believed that a human being is really an eternal spirit, that became
trapped inside a body. Since the body is a prison, it is necessarily evil,
therefore the ultimate goal of the Gnostic Docetism is to escape the body and
the material world, and to reunite with the spiritual.
This
foundational ground that matter as
inherently evil, lead them to forbid people to marry (rejected the idea
that human being (a flesh/matter) is a co-creator of God since matter create
matter) and commanding them to abstain from certain foods that will nourish the body as described by Paul in 1Timothy 4:3
This
heretical teaching was emerge during the end of the first century where some of
the Apostle (like Paul) were still alive and indeed before Apostle John wrote
his gospel!
St.
Jerome wrote:
While the apostles were still surviving,
while Christ's blood was still fresh in Judea, the Lord's body was asserted to
be but a phantasm. [adv. Lucifer 23]
* Phantasm:
Something apparently seen but having no physical reality.
It
is possible that the holder of this belief came from Christ’s followers [1 Corinthians
15:6]
After that, he was seen (as risen Christ) by more than 500 of
his followers at one time, most of whom are still alive, though some have died.
who
believe in him but slid to heretical belief [2Timothy 4:3b] and left the
Church [1John
2:19]
They will follow their own desires and will
look for teachers who will tell them whatever their itching ears want to hear. [2Timothy 4:3b]
Dear children, this is the last hour; and
as you have heard that the antichrist is coming, even now many antichrists have come.
This is how we know it is the last hour. These people left our churches, but they never
really belonged with us; otherwise they would have stayed with us. When they
left, it proved that they did not belong with us. [1John 2:18-19]
John
goes out of his way to refute this heresy and to affirm the humanity and death
of Christ. In his gospel he wrote:
[John 1:14] And the Word
became flesh and dwelt among us, and we have seen his glory, glory
as of the only Son from the Father, full of grace and truth.
Truly,
Christ did not assume "the appearance" of flesh, but actual flesh.
[1John 1:1] That which was from the beginning, which we have
heard, which we have seen with our eyes, which we have looked at and
our hands
have touched—this we proclaim concerning the Word of life.
This
is a recurring theme in John’s writings, where we also find:
But one of the soldiers pierced his side
with a spear, and at once there came out blood and water. [John 19:34]
That
Christ died in the flesh. John also reminds the faithful about how demonic
the Docetism is, in his two epistles we read:
Dear friends, do not believe everyone who
claims to speak by the Spirit. You must test them to see if the spirit they
have comes from God. For there are many false prophets in the world. This is how you
can recognize the Spirit of God: Every spirit that acknowledges that Jesus
Christ has come in the flesh is from God, [1 John 4:2] But if someone
claims to be a prophet and does not acknowledge the truth about Jesus, that
person is not from God. Such a person has the spirit of the Antichrist, which
you heard is coming into the world and indeed is already here. [1 John
4:3]
For many deceivers have gone out into the world, those who do not confess the coming of Jesus Christ in the flesh. Such a one is the deceiver and the antichrist. [2 John 7]
For many deceivers have gone out into the world, those who do not confess the coming of Jesus Christ in the flesh. Such a one is the deceiver and the antichrist. [2 John 7]
Some
may ask: why did the Apostles and Elders go
and call for a council to suppress this wrong teaching like they did in the
council of Jerusalem (in addressing the issue of circumcision)?
Answer:
It is impossible for them to convey another council because the persecutions on
Christian communities by the Roman Empire were now started and some of the
faithful go underground. (like Paul, when he wrote his epistles to Timothy he
was already in prison)
………..
In
finding more about this belief, One Gnostic gospel called Gospel of Peter is a good example:
And they brought two malefactors, and
crucified the Lord between them. But he kept silence, as one feeling no pain.
And when they set the cross upright, they wrote thereon: This is the King of
Israel. And they laid his garments before him, and divided them among
themselves and cast the lot upon them. But one of those malefactors reproached
them, saying: We have thus suffered for the evils which we have done; but this
man which hath become the savior of men, wherein hath he injured you? And they
were wroth with him, and commanded that his legs should not be broken, that so
he might die in torment. Now it was noonday, and darkness prevailed over all
Judea: and they were troubled and in an agony lest the sun should have set, for
that he yet lived: for it is written for them that the sun should not set upon
him that hath been slain (murdered). And one of them said: Give ye him to drink
gall with vinegar: and they mingled it and gave him to drink: and they
fulfilled all things and accomplished their sins upon their own heads. And many
went about with lamps, supposing that it was night: and some fell. And the Lord
cried out aloud saying: My power, my power, thou hast forsaken me. And when he
had so said, he was taken up.
Frederick
Fyvie Bruce said:
The docetic note in this narrative appears
in the statement that Jesus, while being crucified, 'remained silent, as though
he felt no pain', and in the account of his death. It carefully avoids saying
that he died, preferring to say that he 'was taken up', as though he - or at
least his soul or spiritual self - was 'assumed' direct from the cross to the
presence of God. Then the cry of dereliction is reproduced in a form which suggests
that, at that moment, his divine power left the bodily shell in which it had
taken up temporary residence.
Gnostic
Docetism is even found in the Koran's teaching on Jesus (viewing Christ as only
a divine illuminator):
And for claiming that they killed the
Messiah, Jesus, son of Mary, the messenger of GOD. In fact, they never killed
him, they never crucified him - they were made to think that they did. All
factions who are disputing in this matter are full of doubt concerning this
issue. They possess no knowledge; they only conjecture. For certain, they never
killed him. [Koran 4:157]
Another Apostolic Father, Ignatius of Antioch who live
during the time of Apostles, (he is the disciple of Apostle John) is clearly
writing against docetics when he says,
"He was then truly born, truly grew up, truly ate and
drank, was truly crucified, and died, and rose again." [Philippians 3]
To
a friend, keeper and lovers of Felix’s Doctrine I would suggest to please study
the history of Christ’s Church – the ONE, HOLY, APOSTOLIC CATHOLIC CHURCH. sorry to disappoint you :)
The heresy of Gnosticism it appears on the scene at the end of the first century AD. His major exponent was Plotinus the author of the book the Eneddas (most probably I spelled wrong). Plotinus was not a good writer so Porphyry was the author of the book. Its doctrine can be taken as like that of Pythagoras: abstinence, meditation and the central core of this heresy is: that one can attain the greatest degree of sainthood by one’s own means. The grace of God has no real meaning, and Christ as most of the heresies sustain, was a great man but no divine. This doctrine was relevant at the time of Christ in the Roman Empire. To summarize my argument there are two books that deal with this heresy, the one that I have mentioned above and the book “Against the Heresies” by St. Irene us (excuse my spelling). To go in detail about the concepts and beliefs of Gnosticism is beyond of the short space we have. Suffices to say that, the battle, for the throne of heaven still in dispute until now according to them, it is worth to mention that behind any single heresy there is always a Jew.
ReplyDeleteVery nice info :)
ReplyDeleteI believe that Docetic during first century had different variation, but one thing is for sure they view matter as evil. that's why it took for the church a hundred years before it formally condemn this heretical group.
God bless
It was not matter per se because they were aware that matter was part of the very essence. They thought of matter as very heavy load to ascend to higher levels of contemplation of the spiritual realm. As I have said, in the Eneddas the Opus Magnus of Gnosticism, you may find that their view of the universe was close to the view that current scientists hold. Except that, this priesthood uses more exotics ways (very abstract math) to describe the universe. Parallel universes, liquid universes to name just a few, keep in mind that, “under this sun there is nothing new.”
Deletelol.
ReplyDeleteyou hit the nail.
God bless once again.